THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
PART II
In the part I, you saw how the World took out God from the realm of science – embracing a purely naturalistic approach instead.
How did that work out? Was ditching the divine the masterstroke they thought it would be?
Time to find out – and to kick off the show, how about checking some of the biggest unanswered questions our todays self-proclaimed science “gurus” have carefully swept under the rug?
All by using science, of course!
The 6 Greatest Mysteries
Because with all the claims we’ve made, it’s time for us to deliver!
Let’s cut to the chase and see the questions that would ruin any modern scientist’s dinner party:
How Did the Solar System Come to Be?
Well, when you zoom in on the details, stuff like the formation of the Sun and the planets are all but clear.
Take the mechanism behind the formation of planetary orbits and the distribution of planetary types; you can ask them – they just don’t really know.
Why Are the Sun and the Moon the Same Size in the Sky?
Yet they look almost the same size from where we’re standing. Coincidence?
Maybe, but what are the odds, and how did it come to be?
Again, ask them; they just won’t know.
Is There a Planet X?
It’s like the universe’s version of a hidden treasure map.
Some odd movements out there suggest there might be something big lurking in the shadows.
But the scientific community? They’re still debating and researching it.
Where Do Comets Come From?
One is a band of icy bodies just beyond Neptune, and the other is a spherical shell of icy objects at the outermost edge of the Solar System.
The thing is, they’ve got no idea of the precise nature and extent of the Oort Cloud…
Is the Solar System Unique?
Sure, the more we find, the more insight we get, but the cold truth is… We barely know anything…
How will the Solar System End?
Again, the scientific community doesn’t really know and is still debating it.
Well, well, well – seems like our Truth keepers are pretty oblivious to many important things regarding the Universe.
But hey, let’s not just point fingers
If they are so adamant about their naturalistic model, they must have some stuff to back it up, right?
Well, let’s see…
The Star Formation dilemma
“If none of us knew in advance that stars exist, frontline research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form”
Must come from some modern science detractor, right?
Guess again, this quote is actually from Neil deGrasse Tyson in “Death by Black Hole and Other Cosmic Quandaries” (New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2007), p. 187.
But, would one of the most famous astrophysicists say something like this?
Simple, everything we observe and keep finding today challenges the very model used to explain the formation of stars.
Even worse, they actually show that such processes are highly improbable or some would even say impossible.
How so? Let’s find out:
Extreme Conditions for Star Formation
Where if you mess up just a tiny bit, poof, it just blows up your oven.
That’s star formation for you.
You need the perfect mix: enough cosmic ingredients (gas and dust), a massive kitchen (space), and just the right conditions.
Then, it’s all about balancing everything perfectly—from the pull of gravity to the heat of the kitchen.
Sounds like a high-wire act, right? Because it is.
Counterintuitive Processes
Sounds like a tornado turning into a skyscraper – it doesn’t make sense.
I mean, how could chaos turn into something so perfect without a blueprint?
If you find it hard to explain, don’t worry; you’re not alone – scientists have been losing their hair for decades about it.
Complexity of Astrophysical Phenomena
It’s all about understanding the universe’s most bizarre rules, and sometimes, those rules are so complex, they feel more like magic than science.
Weird for something grounded purely on “facts”.
The truth is, without seeing these cosmic tricks happen in front of our eyes, modern scientists are often left scratching their heads,
Wondering if they’re getting punk’d by the universe.
Historical Challenges in Astrophysics
“You’re telling me there’s an invisible cosmic vacuum cleaner that sucks up everything, even light?”
Yeah, right. But as wild as it sounds, these cosmic phenomena are real—though proving they exist without seeing them is a bit like trying to explain the internet to a caveman.
The Role of Observational Evidence:
It’s like trying to guess the plot of a movie by only reading its reviews.
Seems like our so-called “experts” are doing more guesswork to paint the narrative in a certain light rather than seeking the truth.
But hey, I hear you – they might be struggling with stars, but what about what we know of our solar system?
Let’s find out!
Formation of the Solar System – Another unsolved mystery
Do you remember how naturalism put a very important emphasis on phenomenon happening due to natural causes over a certain period of time to explain things?
Funny how this very same principle ends up biting them in the feet.
So, what about the Solar system? Well…
Complexity of the Process
each ingredient practically has its own mind — the aggregation of dust and gas into planetesimals, the accretion of these bodies into planets, and the clearing of the remaining debris.
And remember, it needs to be done PERFECTLY for the whole thing to work. Pretty hard to believe if you didn’t know it existed in the first place.
Balancing of Forces
It requires a delicate balance of gravitational, centrifugal, and other forces.
And without hard, observable evidence, you might as well try to sell an oceanfront mansion in Arizona.
Diversity and Uniqueness of Planetary Systems
Turns out, the more we learn about planetary systems, the more modern theories get put to the test.
Diversity and Uniqueness of Planetary Systems
The big revelation? Turns out, the more we learn about planetary systems, the more modern theories get put to the test.
Why? Because each solar system we stumble upon is like a snowflake — no two are the same, including our own backyard.
This diversity and uniqueness keep scientists on their toes, constantly reevaluating what they thought they knew.
Counterintuitive Elements
None of it would make sense if we hadn’t seen it with our very own eyes.
Historical Misconceptions
It was preached everywhere UNTIL observational evidence started to point at the heliocentric model instead…
Same goes for solar systems; the more we dig, the more we get proven wrong. Nice!
Feels like we’re a running in circle, right?
Wait until we see what they say about the Moon.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to see if our Naturalist friend finally got something right?
Sister, Daughter, Lover? The Lunar Mystery.
Alright, so if I am not mistaken, it seems that modern scientists know:
– Nothing about the formation of stars
– Nothing about the origin of the solar system
Great…
So, let’s see what they said about our closest celestial body:
Sister Theory Idea
That’s why they called it Sister after all! Well, turns out this theory is a complete flop.
Why? The Moon lacks iron and volatile elements that are present on Earth.
Wife Theory
The idea was that she formed somewhere else in the solar system until one day, boom, she saw how pretty the Earth was and got captured by its gravity.
The hiccup? It would require some very specific conditions for something as big as the Moon to be captured without being destabilized or completely breaking…
And that’s without taking into account all the similarities in oxygen isotopes between the two.
Daughter Theory
Yup, they went there too – Here, they assumed that the Moon was once part of the Earth and separated from it early in the planet’s history.
The problem? With our current understanding, proposed mechanisms like the centrifugal spin-off are just physically impossible,
And let’s not talk about the amount of energy needed for such an event to occur…
So, we got 3 theories that got trashed by our geological and astronomical data.
On top of that, space missions like Apollo got us more insight into the Moon’s composition.
If we combine that with computer modeling and current understanding of planetary dynamics, we got…
Meteorite Theory
Yup, that’s what they are running with now. Apparently, it lines up with what we know about the Moon’s composition, its lower density, and other geological evidence.
Let’s hope they don’t throw this one out in the next few years or so…
A Defective Model?
To close this off, how about a little quote from physics Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg?
“You may have noticed that despite all these brave words, I have not explained the origin of the universe. The reason, of course, is that this is a matter about which scientists still have no clear idea… it may be that we shall never know, just as we may never learn the ultimate laws of nature. But I wouldn’t bet on it.”
– Origins, Science 230.4721 (Oct 4, 1985), p18.
Wait, did I read correctly, or did this acclaimed secular physicist just admit “we may never learn” the laws of nature?
I mean, is it really that surprising when we have stuff like:
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding evidence against the current Naturalistic model.
So, what should we do?
Normally, when a model needs to be refined and adjusted over and over because of new data, we go back to the drawing board and come up with a new one.
Why not act like scientists and do the same?
I mean, we keep finding new observable data that bring up fundamental issues with naturalism.
So why desperately try to fit a square peg into a round hole?
Now, it might seem crazy, but the truth is actually simple to grasp.
It’s all about men taking God’s place, kind of like Charles Lyell wanted.
With that in mind, everything is up for grabs as long as we can “prove” that our Lord had nothing to do with our origin.
It doesn’t matter if it sounds crazy to us or not, as an infamous dictator once said: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
what should we do? Accept everything that’s fed to us, like the Nazis did when Hitler spoke those words, or seek the truth?
How about we check if observational science contradicts the Bible like it did for naturalism, or if it supports it instead?
- Seek more knowledge -
Join our covenant
And March Down With Us On the Battlefield
In the part I, you saw how the World took out God from the realm of science – embracing a purely naturalistic approach instead.
How did that work out? Was ditching the divine the masterstroke they thought it would be?
Time to find out – and to kick off the show,
how about checking some of the biggest unanswered questions our todays self-proclaimed science “gurus” have carefully swept under the rug?
All by using science, of course!
The 6 Greatest Mysteries
Because with all the claims we’ve made, it’s time for us to deliver!
Let’s cut to the chase and see the questions that would ruin any modern scientist’s dinner party:
How Did the Solar System Come to Be?
The problem? Well, when you zoom in on the details,
Stuff like the formation of the Sun and the planets are all but clear.
Take the mechanism behind the formation of planetary orbits and the distribution of planetary types;
You can ask them – they just don’t really know.
Why Are the Sun and the Moon the Same Size in the Sky?
Yet they look almost the same size from where we’re standing.
Coincidence? Maybe, but what are the odds, and how did it come to be? Again, ask them; they just won’t know.
Is There a Planet X?
Some odd movements out there suggest there might be something big lurking in the shadows.
But the scientific community? They’re still debating and researching it.
Where Do Comets Come From?
One is a band of icy bodies just beyond Neptune, and the other is a spherical shell of icy objects at the outermost edge of the Solar System.
The thing is, they’ve got no idea of the precise nature and extent of the Oort Cloud…
Is the Solar System Unique?
Sure, the more we find, the more insight we get, but the cold truth is… We barely know anything…
How will the Solar System End?
Again, the scientific community doesn’t really know and is still debating it.
Well, well, well – seems like our Truth keepers are pretty oblivious to many important things regarding the Universe.
But hey, let’s not just point fingers – if they are so adamant about their naturalistic model, they must have some stuff to back it up, right?
Well, let’s see…
The Star Formation dilemma
“If none of us knew in advance that stars exist, frontline research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form”
Must come from some modern science detractor, right?
Guess again, this quote is actually from Neil deGrasse Tyson in “Death by Black Hole and Other Cosmic Quandaries”
(New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2007), p. 187.
But, would one of the most famous astrophysicists say something like this?
Simple, everything we observe and keep finding today challenges the very model used to explain the formation of stars.
Even worse, they actually show that such processes are highly improbable or some would even say impossible.
How so? Let’s find out:
Extreme Conditions for Star Formation
Where if you mess up just a tiny bit, poof, it just blows up your oven.
That’s star formation for you. You need the perfect mix: enough cosmic ingredients (gas and dust), a massive kitchen (space), and just the right conditions.
Then, it’s all about balancing everything perfectly—from the pull of gravity to the heat of the kitchen. Sounds like a high-wire act, right? Because it is.
Counterintuitive Processes
Sounds like a tornado turning into a skyscraper – it doesn’t make sense.
I mean, how could chaos turn into something so perfect without a blueprint?
If you find it hard to explain, don’t worry; you’re not alone – scientists have been losing their hair for decades about it.
Complexity of Astrophysical Phenomena
It’s all about understanding the universe’s most bizarre rules, and sometimes, those rules are so complex, they feel more like magic than science.
Weird for something grounded purely on “facts”. The truth is, without seeing these cosmic tricks happen in front of our eyes,
Modern scientists are often left scratching their heads, wondering if they’re getting punk’d by the universe.
Historical Challenges in Astrophysics
“You’re telling me there’s an invisible cosmic vacuum cleaner that sucks up everything, even light?”
Yeah, right. But as wild as it sounds, these cosmic phenomena are real—though proving they exist without seeing them is a bit like trying to explain the internet to a caveman.
The Role of Observational Evidence:
Without the ability to observe stars being born, living their lives, and eventually dying, all our theories are just wild guesses.
It’s like trying to guess the plot of a movie by only reading its reviews.
Seems like our so-called “experts” are doing more guesswork to paint the narrative in a certain light rather than seeking the truth.
But hey, I hear you – they might be struggling with stars, but what about what we know of our solar system?
Let’s find out!
Formation of the Solar System – Another unsolved mystery
Do you remember how naturalism put a very important emphasis on phenomenon happening due to natural causes over a certain period of time to explain things?
Funny how this very same principle ends up biting them in the feet.
So, what about the Solar system? Well…
Complexity of the Process
each ingredient practically has its own mind — the aggregation of dust and gas into planetesimals, the accretion of these bodies into planets, and the clearing of the remaining debris.
And remember, it needs to be done PERFECTLY for the whole thing to work. Pretty hard to believe if you didn’t know it existed in the first place.
Balancing of Forces
It requires a delicate balance of gravitational, centrifugal, and other forces.
And without hard, observable evidence, you might as well try to sell an oceanfront mansion in Arizona.
Diversity and Uniqueness of Planetary Systems
Turns out, the more we learn about planetary systems, the more modern theories get put to the test.
Why? Because each solar system we stumble upon is like a snowflake — no two are the same, including our own backyard.
This diversity and uniqueness keep scientists on their toes, constantly reevaluating what they thought they knew.
Counterintuitive Elements
None of it would make sense if we hadn’t seen it with our very own eyes.
Historical Misconceptions
It was preached everywhere UNTIL observational evidence started to point at the heliocentric model instead…
Same goes for solar systems; the more we dig, the more we get proven wrong. Nice!
Feels like we’re a running in circle, right?
Wait until we see what they say about the Moon.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to see if our Naturalist friend finally got something right?
Sister, Daughter, Lover? The Lunar Mystery.
Alright, so if I am not mistaken, it seems that modern scientists know:
– Nothing about the formation of stars
– Nothing about the origin of the solar system
Great…
So, let’s see what they said about our closest celestial body:
Sister Theory Idea
That’s why they called it Sister after all! Well, turns out this theory is a complete flop. Why? The Moon lacks iron and volatile elements that are present on Earth.
Wife Theory
The idea was that she formed somewhere else in the solar system until one day, boom, she saw how pretty the Earth was and got captured by its gravity.
The hiccup? It would require some very specific conditions for something as big as the Moon to be captured without being destabilized or completely breaking…
And that’s without taking into account all the similarities in oxygen isotopes between the two.
Daughter Theory
Here, they assumed that the Moon was once part of the Earth and separated from it early in the planet’s history.
The problem? With our current understanding, proposed mechanisms like the centrifugal spin-off are just physically impossible,
And let’s not talk about the amount of energy needed for such an event to occur…
So, we got 3 theories that got trashed by our geological and astronomical data.
On top of that, space missions like Apollo got us more insight into the Moon’s composition.
If we combine that with computer modeling and current understanding of planetary dynamics, we got…
Meteorite Theory
Yup, that’s what they are running with now. Apparently, it lines up with what we know about the Moon’s composition, its lower density, and other geological evidence.
Let’s hope they don’t throw this one out in the next few years or so…
A Defective Model?
To close this off, how about a little quote from physics Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg?
“You may have noticed that despite all these brave words, I have not explained the origin of the universe. The reason, of course, is that this is a matter about which scientists still have no clear idea… it may be that we shall never know, just as we may never learn the ultimate laws of nature. But I wouldn’t bet on it.”
– Origins, Science 230.4721 (Oct 4, 1985), p18.
Wait, did I read correctly, or did this acclaimed secular physicist just admit “we may never learn” the laws of nature?
I mean, is it really that surprising when we have stuff like:
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding evidence against the current Naturalistic model.
So, what should we do?
Normally, when a model needs to be refined and adjusted over and over because of new data, we go back to the drawing board and come up with a new one.
Why not act like scientists and do the same?
I mean, we keep finding new observable data that bring up fundamental issues with naturalism.
So why desperately try to fit a square peg into a round hole?
Now, it might seem crazy, but the truth is actually simple to grasp.
It’s all about men taking God’s place, kind of like Charles Lyell wanted.
With that in mind, everything is up for grabs as long as we can “prove” that our Lord had nothing to do with our origin.
It doesn’t matter if it sounds crazy to us or not, as an infamous dictator once said: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
what should we do? Accept everything that’s fed to us, like the Nazis did when Hitler spoke those words, or seek the truth?
How about we check if observational science contradicts the Bible like it did for naturalism, or if it supports it instead?
- Seek more knowledge -
Are you ready to challenge your belief?
One religion, one government, One culture.
Who is behind this Satanic Agenda?
How did the World become so spiritual?
Join our covenant
And March Down With Us On the Battlefield
In the part I, you saw how the World took out God from the realm of science – embracing a purely naturalistic approach instead.
How did that work out? Was ditching the divine the masterstroke they thought it would be?
Time to find out – and to kick off the show,
How about checking some of the biggest unanswered questions our todays self-proclaimed science “gurus” have carefully swept under the rug?
All by using science, of course!
The 6 Greatest Mysteries
Let’s cut to the chase and see the questions that would ruin any modern scientist’s dinner party:
Because with all the claims we’ve made, it’s time for us to deliver!
How Did the Solar System Come to Be?
Well, when you zoom in on the details, stuff like the formation of the Sun and the planets are all but clear.
Take the mechanism behind the formation of planetary orbits and the distribution of planetary types;
you can ask them – they just don’t really know.
Why Are the Sun and the Moon the Same Size in the Sky?
Especially when we know the sun is about 400 times wider and 400 times further away.
Yet they look almost the same size from where we’re standing. Coincidence?
Maybe, but what are the odds, and how did it come to be? Again, ask them; they just won’t know.
Is There a Planet X?
Some odd movements out there suggest there might be something big lurking in the shadows.
But the scientific community? They’re still debating and researching it.
Where Do Comets Come From?
One is a band of icy bodies just beyond Neptune, and the other is a spherical shell of icy objects at the outermost edge of the Solar System.
The thing is, they’ve got no idea of the precise nature and extent of the Oort Cloud…
Is the Solar System Unique?
Is our solar system special, or just another face in the galactic crowd?
Sure, the more we find, the more insight we get, but the cold truth is… We barely know anything…
How will the Solar System End?
But what will happen then?
Again, the scientific community doesn’t really know and is still debating it.
Well, well, well – seems like our Truth keepers are pretty oblivious to many important things regarding the Universe.
But hey, let’s not just point fingers – if they are so adamant about their naturalistic model, they must have some stuff to back it up, right?
Well, let’s see…
The Star Formation dilemma
“If none of us knew in advance that stars exist, frontline research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form”
Must come from some modern science detractor, right?
Guess again, this quote is actually from Neil deGrasse Tyson in “Death by Black Hole and Other Cosmic Quandaries” (New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2007), p. 187.
But, would one of the most famous astrophysicists say something like this?
Simple, everything we observe and keep finding today challenges the very model used to explain the formation of stars.
Even worse, they actually show that such processes are highly improbable or some would even say impossible.
How so? Let’s find out:
Extreme Conditions for Star Formation
But the most temperamental cake ever made, where if you mess up just a tiny bit, poof, it just blows up your oven.
That’s star formation for you. You need the perfect mix: enough cosmic ingredients (gas and dust), a massive kitchen (space), and just the right conditions.
Then, it’s all about balancing everything perfectly—from the pull of gravity to the heat of the kitchen. Sounds like a high-wire act, right? Because it is.
Counterintuitive Processes
Sounds like a tornado turning into a skyscraper – it doesn’t make sense. I mean, how could chaos turn into something so perfect without a blueprint?
If you find it hard to explain, don’t worry; you’re not alone – scientists have been losing their hair for decades about it.
Complexity of Astrophysical Phenomena
It’s all about understanding the universe’s most bizarre rules, and sometimes, those rules are so complex, they feel more like magic than science.
Weird for something grounded purely on “facts”. The truth is, without seeing these cosmic tricks happen in front of our eyes,
Modern scientists are often left scratching their heads, wondering if they’re getting punk’d by the universe.
Historical Challenges in Astrophysics
“You’re telling me there’s an invisible cosmic vacuum cleaner that sucks up everything, even light?” Yeah, right.
But as wild as it sounds, these cosmic phenomena are real
Though proving they exist without seeing them is a bit like trying to explain the internet to a caveman.
The Role of Observational Evidence:
Without the ability to observe stars being born, living their lives, and eventually dying, all our theories are just wild guesses.
It’s like trying to guess the plot of a movie by only reading its reviews.
Seems like our so-called “experts” are doing more guesswork to paint the narrative in a certain light rather than seeking the truth.
But hey, I hear you – they might be struggling with stars, but what about what we know of our solar system?
Let’s find out!
Formation of the Solar System – Another unsolved mystery
Do you remember how naturalism put a very important emphasis on phenomenon happening due to natural causes over a certain period of time to explain things?
Funny how this very same principle ends up biting them in the feet.
So, what about the Solar system? Well…
Complexity of the Process
Well, the Solar System is no different; each ingredient practically has its own mind
The aggregation of dust and gas into planetesimals, the accretion of these bodies into planets, and the clearing of the remaining debris.
And remember, it needs to be done PERFECTLY for the whole thing to work.
Pretty hard to believe if you didn’t know it existed in the first place.
Balancing of Forces
It requires a delicate balance of gravitational, centrifugal, and other forces.
And without hard, observable evidence, you might as well try to sell an oceanfront mansion in Arizona.
Diversity and Uniqueness of Planetary Systems
The big revelation? Turns out, the more we learn about planetary systems, the more modern theories get put to the test.
Why? Because each solar system we stumble upon is like a snowflake — no two are the same, including our own backyard.
This diversity and uniqueness keep scientists on their toes, constantly reevaluating what they thought they knew.
Counterintuitive Elements
None of it would make sense if we hadn’t seen it with our very own eyes.
Historical Misconceptions
It was preached everywhere UNTIL observational evidence started to point at the heliocentric model instead…
Same goes for solar systems; the more we dig, the more we get proven wrong. Nice!
Feels like we’re a running in circle, right?
Wait until we see what they say about the Moon.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to see if our Naturalist friend finally got something right?
Sister, Daughter, Lover? The Lunar Mystery.
Alright, so if I am not mistaken, it seems that modern scientists know:
– Nothing about the formation of stars
– Nothing about the origin of the solar system
Great…
So, let’s see what they said about our closest celestial body:
Sister Theory Idea
That’s why they called it Sister after all! Well, turns out this theory is a complete flop.
Why? The Moon lacks iron and volatile elements that are present on Earth.
Wife Theory
The idea was that she formed somewhere else in the solar system until one day, boom, she saw how pretty the Earth was and got captured by its gravity.
The hiccup? It would require some very specific conditions for something as big as the Moon to be captured without being destabilized or completely breaking…
And that’s without taking into account all the similarities in oxygen isotopes between the two.
Daughter Theory
Yup, they went there too – Here, they assumed that the Moon was once part of the Earth and separated from it early in the planet’s history.
The problem? With our current understanding, proposed mechanisms like the centrifugal spin-off are just physically impossible,
And let’s not talk about the amount of energy needed for such an event to occur…
So, we got 3 theories that got trashed by our geological and astronomical data.
On top of that, space missions like Apollo got us more insight into the Moon’s composition.
If we combine that with computer modeling and current understanding of planetary dynamics, we got…
Meteorite Theory
This time, scientists claim that the Moon was formed from the debris left after a Mars-sized body hit the Earth.
Yup, that’s what they are running with now.
Apparently, it lines up with what we know about the Moon’s composition, its lower density, and other geological evidence.
Let’s hope they don’t throw this one out in the next few years or so…
A Defective Model?
To close this off, how about a little quote from physics Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg?
“You may have noticed that despite all these brave words, I have not explained the origin of the universe. The reason, of course, is that this is a matter about which scientists still have no clear idea… it may be that we shall never know, just as we may never learn the ultimate laws of nature. But I wouldn’t bet on it.”
– Origins, Science 230.4721 (Oct 4, 1985), p18.
Wait, did I read correctly, or did this acclaimed secular physicist just admit “we may never learn” the laws of nature?
I mean, is it really that surprising when we have stuff like:
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding evidence against the current Naturalistic model.
So, what should we do?
Normally, when a model needs to be refined and adjusted over and over because of new data, we go back to the drawing board and come up with a new one.
Why not act like scientists and do the same?
I mean, we keep finding new observable data that bring up fundamental issues with naturalism.
So why desperately try to fit a square peg into a round hole?
Why not act like scientists and do the same?
I mean, we keep finding new observable data that bring up fundamental issues with naturalism.
So why desperately try to fit a square peg into a round hole?
Now, it might seem crazy, but the truth is actually simple to grasp.
It’s all about men taking God’s place, kind of like Charles Lyell wanted.
With that in mind, everything is up for grabs as long as we can “prove” that our Lord had nothing to do with our origin.
It doesn’t matter if it sounds crazy to us or not, as an infamous dictator once said: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
what should we do? Accept everything that’s fed to us, like the Nazis did when Hitler spoke those words, or seek the truth?
How about we check if observational science contradicts the Bible like it did for naturalism, or if it supports it instead?
- Seek more knowledge -
Seek more knowledge
RELIGION
Are we talking about divine revelation? Or merely following the earthly desires of men?
Let’s rip off the veil and uncover what lies behind modern religions.
Are you ready to challenge your belief?
NEW WORLD ORDER
One religion, one government, One culture.
The Rulers of this World are clearly aiming to uniformize everything.
Are they doing what’s best for us? Or leading us to eternal damnation?
THE WORLD
What is a woman? That’s today’s biggest mystery.
Not surprising when most folks gorge on anti-depressant, eat bugs and start identifying as lawnmowers…
How far as humanity fallen? And who is behind this satanic agenda?
THE OCCULT
Atheism is growing today.
While practices like Yoga, Reiki and Astrology are more popular than before.
But where did they come from?
And how did the World become so spiritual?
Join our covenant
And March Down With Us On the Battlefield
